home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
032194
/
0321unk.000
< prev
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-05-26
|
4KB
|
91 lines
<text id=94TT0335>
<title>
Mar. 21, 1994: The Political Interest
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
Mar. 21, 1994 Hard Times For Hillary
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THE POLITICAL INTEREST, Page 37
Caught In The Web
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By Michael Kramer
</p>
<p> The press routinely describes him as a "central figure" in
the scandal. "He should be fired," says Republican Senator Al
D'Amato. Or at least put "out of the picture" on an unpaid leave
of absence, said Republican Senate Leader Bob Dole last Friday.
The target of these attacks is Deputy Treasury Secretary Roger
Altman, the latest Clinton Administration official caught in
the Whitewater affair's web of fact and innuendo.
</p>
<p> Political trouble threatens all in its path indiscriminately.
Public officials served with subpoenas suffer tarnished reputations
no matter the ultimate result--which is why distinctions should
be drawn. Where does Altman fit?
</p>
<p> With impressive government experience already behind him, Altman
probably felt confident that he knew the rules of the game when
he joined Clinton last year. As Jimmy Carter's Assistant Treasury
Secretary, Altman helped engineer the Chrysler bailout. Thanks
to his talent and good luck (he and Clinton became friends in
college), Altman is now Lloyd Bentsen's understudy. He is also
acting head of the Resolution Trust Corporation, an assignment
he accepted to fill a temporary vacancy in the RTC's chairmanship.
This is the chore that has sullied him.
</p>
<p> The job is particularly sensitive because the agency is trying
to recapture money lost from failed savings and loans like Madison
Guaranty of Little Rock, the institution with ties to the Clintons'
hapless Whitewater Development Corp. As a result of Altman's
congressional testimony, the public now knows that Treasury
officials held three meetings with White House aides to discuss
the RTC's Madison investigation. Administration officials confirm
that Altman didn't know about the first two. Those became public
after Altman acknowledged that he himself called the third for
last Feb. 2, a session he describes as a "brief heads-up" designed
to tell the White House what procedures the RTC would follow
before the statute of limitations on potential lawsuits involving
Madison expired at the end of that month. (Congress extended
the statute's deadline shortly thereafter.) Altman has sworn
that he didn't communicate anything about the substance of the
RTC's Madison inquiry. He couldn't have done so, he says, because
he has purposely avoided knowledge of the RTC's cases. So far,
no evidence disputes his contention.
</p>
<p> What's most significant in weighing Altman's culpability is
his actions before the White House meeting. Unlike those involved
in the other White House sessions, Altman sought to avoid any
impropriety, or even its appearance, by clearing his meeting
in advance with Treasury's ethics office. The question: Would
it be proper to convey the innocuous facts regarding the statute
of limitations--facts that had already been provided to inquiring
congressional staff members? Assured there was no problem, Altman
proceeded.
</p>
<p> On Feb. 24, Altman told Congress about his Feb. 2 meeting. Republicans
responded predictably, charging improper conduct. On the following
day, Altman recused himself from any further RTC decisions involving
Madison, even though Treasury and RTC ethics officials say he
had no legal obligation to do so. Unsubstantiated reports allege
that Altman sought the advice of White House aides before his
recusal. He denies that charge, and Administration officials
support him.
</p>
<p> Where does Altman stand now? Under a cloud. Too few news reports
mention that Altman's meeting was cleared by Treasury's ethics
office; too many critics ignore his admission that despite such
clearance, the meeting should not have occurred. So, fault Altman
for political naivete but, unless new information surfaces,
not for venality. A lot about Whitewater smells. Altman doesn't.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>